A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their family members house. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their arranging permission by creating a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, significantly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has considering that grow to be emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o through extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such steps were being cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a place afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included intimately from the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital minute during the authorized timeline.
With the Main of your dispute is a disagreement around boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Specific Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from the sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline along with the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom have to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who should live together with each other extended after the lawful expenditures are actually compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. What's more, it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns which include environmental defense and property legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of your dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, taken out, or done as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable carry on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site one of the most closely watched organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.